<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" version="2.0"><channel><title>Digital Brainwaves - Latest Comments in The Politics of Parsing</title><link>http://digitalbrainwaves.disqus.com/</link><description>One random geek's view of the world around him</description><atom:link href="https://digitalbrainwaves.disqus.com/the_politics_of_parsing/latest.rss" rel="self"></atom:link><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Sun, 04 Nov 2007 11:32:58 -0000</lastBuildDate><item><title>Re: The Politics of Parsing</title><link>http://www.digitalbrainwaves.com/2007/11/04/the-politics-of-parsing/#comment-3437952</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Must not be a fan of Michael Moore's movies either...&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;I wish there were more videos of alpha-geeks exclaiming that "200x will be the year of the Linux Desktop!" so that someone could put together a montage of them... I'm almost as sick of hearing that as I am of politicians!&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Dave</dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 04 Nov 2007 11:32:58 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: The Politics of Parsing</title><link>http://www.digitalbrainwaves.com/2007/11/04/the-politics-of-parsing/#comment-3437953</link><description>&lt;p&gt;No offense, but having not seen those particular debate/interviews, the evidence that there's double-speak going on is kind of flimsy as although she'll directly mention the subject in question in the first clip, Social Security for example, she does not directly mention the subject again in any of the subsequent clips with the dubious exception of the first.  This could well be nothing more than a clever editing job, attributing a specific opinion to the wrong subject.  That sort of think irks me.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">AtlantiCat</dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 04 Nov 2007 07:34:45 -0000</pubDate></item></channel></rss>